Skip to content
    Core Vitality LabCore Vitality Lab
    Editorial Methodology

    How We Review Supplements

    We use an AI-assisted editorial workflow to organize product information and research. AI helps with discovery and structure; it does not prove that a supplement works or replace human judgment.

    Our five-step review process

    A practical process built around traceable information and clear limits.

    1

    Define the reader question

    We start with the decision a reader is trying to make and the limits of what the page can answer.

    Intended use
    Relevant population
    Decision context
    Known limitations
    2

    Check current product information

    We compare the available label and vendor information before discussing a formula.

    Ingredient list
    Serving directions
    Warnings
    Vendor terms
    3

    Review ingredient-level evidence

    When evidence is relevant, we prioritize original human research and reputable evidence summaries.

    Study population
    Dose and form
    Outcome measured
    Study limitations
    4

    Separate evidence from marketing

    Ingredient findings are not treated as proof that a finished product will produce the same result.

    Ingredient vs. product evidence
    Association vs. causation
    Safety context
    No guaranteed outcomes
    5

    Edit, disclose, and update

    We review claims, add affiliate and health disclosures, and correct pages when material information changes.

    Claim wording
    Source links
    Affiliate disclosure
    Corrections and updates

    How we interpret evidence

    A citation supports only the specific question, ingredient, dose, population, and outcome it actually studied.

    Relevance

    A study is useful only when its ingredient, dose, population, and outcome fit the statement being discussed.

    • Ingredient and form
    • Dose
    • Population
    • Measured outcome

    Study quality

    We consider design strengths and weaknesses instead of treating every citation as equal.

    • Study design
    • Sample size
    • Comparison group
    • Duration and limitations

    Product-level limits

    Research on an ingredient does not automatically validate a branded formula or predict an individual result.

    • Finished-product trials
    • Label match
    • Conflicts of interest
    • Uncertainty stated

    Transparency and accountability

    Sources where they matter

    Research-dependent statements should link to the source used or clearly state when evidence is limited.

    Affiliate disclosure

    We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases; readers pay no extra because of our link.

    Health boundaries

    Our content is educational and does not replace diagnosis, treatment, or advice from a qualified clinician.

    Corrections

    Readers can contact us when a label, source, price, or material statement needs review.

    What AI does—and does not do

    AI can assist with

    • • Organizing product and topic information
    • • Finding candidate sources for editorial review
    • • Flagging potentially risky wording
    • • Keeping page structure and disclosures consistent

    AI cannot establish

    • • That a finished supplement is effective
    • • That a product is safe for a specific person
    • • That a testimonial or vendor claim is representative
    • • A diagnosis, treatment plan, or guaranteed outcome

    Compare with the limits in view

    Our pages are designed to help you review labels, ingredient context, safety questions, and vendor terms—not to promise a health result.